Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers racing to find some of the earliest galaxies ever glimpsed have now confirmed that a galaxy first detected last summer is in fact among the earliest ever found. The findings are published in the journal Nature.

Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope, astronomers racing to find some of the earliest galaxies ever glimpsed have now confirmed that a galaxy first detected last summer is in fact among the earliest ever found. The findings are published in the journal Nature.

Follow-up observations since first detection of Maisie’s galaxy have revealed that it is from 390 million years after the Big Bang. Although that’s not quite as early as the team led by University of Texas at Austin astronomer Steven Finkelstein first estimated last summer, it is nonetheless one of the four earliest confirmed galaxies observed.

“The exciting thing about Maisie’s galaxy is that it was one of the first distant galaxies identified by JWST, and of that set, it’s the first to actually be spectroscopically confirmed,” said Finkelstein, a professor of astronomy at UT Austin, an author of the Nature paper and the principal investigator for the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS). He named the galaxy after his daughter as it was discovered on her birthday.

The latest analysis was led by first author Pablo Arrabal Haro, a postdoctoral research ᴀssociate at the National Science Foundation’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory. Besides Finkelstein, co-authors from UT Austin are Caitlin Casey, Micaela Bagley, Katherine Chworowsky and Seiji Fujimoto.

The CEERS team is currently evaluating about 10 other galaxies that might be from an era even earlier than Maisie’s.

Objects in space don’t come printed with a time stamp. To infer when the light we observe left an object, astronomers measure its redshift, the amount that its color has been shifted due to its motion away from us. Because we live in an expanding universe, the farther back in time we look, the higher an object’s redshift.

The original estimates of redshifts (and hence times after the Big Bang) were based on pH๏τometry, the brightness of light in images using a small number of wide frequency filters. Those estimates were made using data collected by CEERS during its originally allotted time for the telescope’s first observing season.

To get a more accurate estimate, the CEERS team applied for follow-up measurements with JWST’s spectroscopic instrument, NIRSpec, which splits an object’s light into many different narrow frequencies to more accurately identify its chemical makeup, heat output, intrinsic brightness and relative motion. According to this latest spectroscopic analysis, Maisie’s galaxy is at a redshift of z=11.4.

This study also looked at CEERS-93316, a galaxy originally found in publicly available CEERS data by a University of Edinburgh-led team and was initially estimated to have been observed at a jaw-dropping 250 million years after the Big Bang. On further analysis, the team found that CEERS-93316 has a more modest redshift of z=4.9, which corresponds to about 1 billion years after the Big Bang.

It turns out that H๏τ gas in CEERS-93316 was emitting so much light in a few narrow frequency bands ᴀssociated with oxygen and hydrogen that it made the galaxy appear much bluer than it really was. That blue cast mimicked the signature Finkelstein and others expected to see in very early galaxies. This is due to a quirk of the pH๏τometric method that happens only for objects with redshifts of about 4.9. Finkelstein says this was a case of bad luck.

“This was a kind of weird case,” Finkelstein said. “Of the many tens of high redshift candidates that have been observed spectroscopically, this is the only instance of the true redshift being much less than our initial guess.”

Not only does this galaxy appear unnaturally blue, it also is much brighter than our current models predict for galaxies that formed so early in the universe.

“It would have been really challenging to explain how the universe could create such a mᴀssive galaxy so soon,” Finkelstein said. “So, I think this was probably always the most likely outcome, because it was so extreme, so bright, at such an apparent high redshift.”

Reference:

Pablo Arrabal Haro et al, Confirmation and refutation of very luminous galaxies in the early universe, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7

Related Posts

Astronomers discover a highly habitable alien planet with a probability of 84% – Highest EVER

The Kepler mission discovered a planet orbiting the star KOI-3010 using the transit method. Researchers are drawn to this world because it has traits that are similar…

Quantum Experiment Breaks Reality By Seeing Two Versions Of Reality Existing At The Same Time

We are aware of how skewed our perception of reality is. How we see the world is shaped by our senses, our societies, and our knowledge. And…

Astronomers just discovered first direct evidence of black hole spinning

In a groundbreaking discovery, astronomers have obtained the first direct evidence confirming that black holes do indeed spin. This monumental finding focuses on the supermᴀssive black hole…

BREAKING🚨: AI Built To Find Aliens Just Picked Up EIGHT Aliens Radio Signals From Outer Space

Up until recently, astronomers have had difficulty separating probable alien signals from those created by humans. Thanks to a new artificial intelligence-trained system, eight unexplained radio signals…

Scientists Watched a Star Explode in Real Time for The First Time Ever

Astronomers have watched a giant star blow up in a fiery supernova for the first time ever — and the spectacle was even more explosive than the…

NASA’s $10 billion Telescope has just captured its first direct unbelievable image of a Planet outside our Solar system

The James Webb Space Telescope has captured the first direct image of a distant exoplanet, a world beyond our Solar System. Webb has returned several pictures of…